News US

Peter Mandelson steps down from the House of Lords following the emergence of leaked Epstein emails

Romain Mazzotti

Peter Mandelson has resigned from the House of Lords following the emergence of communications that connected him to Jeffrey Epstein, a financier convicted of child sexual abuse. The resignation was formally announced through the speaker of the House of Lords. The decision comes after emails surfaced demonstrating that Mandelson had shared sensitive government information with Epstein while serving as business secretary during Gordon Brown’s administration.

The leaked correspondence included briefings on government policy responses to the global financial crisis. Documents from US Department of Justice disclosures revealed financial transfers totaling $75,000 into accounts where Mandelson was identified as a beneficiary. Additionally, Epstein transferred £10,000 to Mandelson’s husband, Reinaldo Avila da Silva, in September 2009, purportedly to cover osteopathy course expenses and related costs.

Prime Minister Keir Starmer had publicly called for Mandelson’s removal from the upper chamber. Starmer advocated for institutional reforms that would enable peers to face expulsion more readily. However, the prime minister lacked direct authority to force such removal, as Mandelson held the position of appointee to the chamber. Mandelson was on leave of absence while serving as US ambassador, which complicated his parliamentary status.

The cabinet secretary initiated an investigation into the apparently leaked emails transmitted by Mandelson during Brown’s final year in office. These communications detailed sensitive matters including potential government asset sales and advance notice of a €500bn European financial bailout. The Metropolitan Police announced it would examine the emails and determine whether a broader inquiry was warranted.

Mandelson had previously resigned from the Labour Party. Remaining a House of Lords member would have required his return and oath-taking during the subsequent parliamentary session. His resignation effectively resolved questions about his future parliamentary role and brought the controversy to an immediate close.

Related Articles

Back to top button
Close